The standard game of Shadow Council is deliberately lean: two Evil players, one shared discussion, one vote a round. It is the version we recommend for any group's first few games, because the deduction is cleanest when the rules are simple. But once a table has played a handful of rounds and learned what a tell looks like, the same setup can start to feel familiar. The variations below are house rules you can agree on before a game begins to change its pace, its stakes, or its difficulty.
None of these are enforced by the app — they are spoken agreements the table makes and runs by hand. That is on purpose. Half the fun of a long-running game is a group inventing its own dialect of the rules. Treat what follows as a starting menu, not a rulebook.
For groups new to social deduction, agree that in the very first round nobody can be voted out — the round exists only to talk and listen. It removes the early-game guesswork where Good players eliminate someone almost at random, and gives everyone a calmer read on the table before the stakes turn real.
In the standard game, the best Good play is to think out loud before voting. Ban it. Under this rule, no one may explain their reasoning before a vote — you may discuss the topic at hand all you like, but the moment talk turns to who is Evil, the table goes quiet and everyone votes on instinct alone. It makes the Evil pair far harder to corner, because the Good players can't pool what they noticed.
Agree that each Evil player must say their secret word at least once per round, out loud, inside a real sentence. It sounds brutal, but skilled Evil players will tell you it changes everything: the pressure isn't whether to plant the word, it's burying it so deep in a genuine thought that nobody clocks it. Good for experienced groups who find the Evil pair winning too easily by simply staying silent.
When an Evil player is voted out early, the game can deflate — a lone remaining Evil has little chance and the deduction loses its engine. As a house rule, agree that the first time an Evil player is eliminated, the host quietly assigns a new Evil from the surviving Good players before the next round, handing them the eliminated player's word. The deduction restarts with a fresh hidden partnership and the table never quite knows whether the threat is over. This works best with seven or more players.
Between two voting rounds, allow the Evil side a single secret elimination across the whole game — a "strike" that removes one Good player of their choosing, announced by the host at the start of the next round with no explanation of who chose it. It tilts the game sharply toward Evil, so use it only with larger groups where Good has the numbers to absorb the loss, and only once per game. Decide in advance how the Evil pair signals the choice to the host — passing a phone under the table is the simplest method.
Across an evening of several games, keep a tally on paper: a point to every player on the winning side each game, plus a bonus point to any Evil player who correctly identified their partner before being caught. Rotate the host between games so no one sits out the fun of playing. Over a long dinner this turns a string of one-off games into a single arc with a winner at the end.
If your group is bilingual, agree that the words come in one language but the conversation may flow in another. An Evil player holding a Swedish word who must surface it in an English conversation has a genuinely harder, funnier task. Set the word language to match whichever the players read most comfortably, and let the talk go wherever it naturally goes.
Past about fourteen players the single conversation gets unwieldy. Split into two tables, each hosting its own game, and race: the first council to correctly unmask both its Evil players wins the round. It keeps everyone in a conversation small enough to actually read.
© 2026 Patrik Stalbarg · greblats.com